I was surprised that Matt Kelly said this doesn't help city's goals for affordable housing. Would like to hear more about his reasoning. (I've seen him speak on the topic at a candidate forum.)
Thanks Matt for taking the time to spot the comment and reply. And needless to say, for being a part of FXBG Advance.
Yes, this point would have been a welcome addition in the story (ahem.) That said: I don't think the complainants are arguing against the price point. Would they be ok if it was $400k units?
Would your position change if the prices were more affordable, or are your other concerns more germane?
I was surprised that Matt Kelly said this doesn't help city's goals for affordable housing. Would like to hear more about his reasoning. (I've seen him speak on the topic at a candidate forum.)
Thanks Matt for taking the time to spot the comment and reply. And needless to say, for being a part of FXBG Advance.
Yes, this point would have been a welcome addition in the story (ahem.) That said: I don't think the complainants are arguing against the price point. Would they be ok if it was $400k units?
Would your position change if the prices were more affordable, or are your other concerns more germane?