Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adam Blosser's avatar

There's a lot to like about this article, but a couple sentences in particular give me pause.

"If Little Johnny is disruptive, Little Johnny can go to an alternative school and learn there."

"Removing students who refuse to learn is not just an ethical need but a moral imperative."

There was a time when I would have whole heartily agreed with these sentences. Then the school division tried to send MY CHILD with a disability to an alternative school because he was in a time of crisis that was brought on by an inexperienced teacher and made worse by a principal who was more concerned with punishing undesired behavior than she was making sure my child's needs were being met at school.

Zero tolerance for disrespect, fighting, cursing, vaping, drug use, etc.? Yes, and amen! But the sentences above are broad enough to give me pause knowing that students with disabilities are disproportionately suspended from school.

Expand full comment
dorothy miller's avatar

We elected five very competent women with a great deal of experience in education...but most importantly we elected five people who genuinely care about children It's a great start.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts