The gerrymandering wars unleashed are not about Democrats and Republicans -- it's about the extent to which we're all willing to go to subvert our opponents, then justify it.
The Supreme Court of Virginia got it right? If anyone can explain how the ordinary rule of grammar contained on page 196 of the oft-cited case of Moore v. Pullem does not take the whole start-of-the-election question out of this redistricting case, please share it here.
Plenty of people who hate gerrymandering in principle still voted for the redistricting amendment.
That mismatch in values and behavior seems interesting to me.
Is it just hypocrisy, as Davis alleges? Maybe talk to some people, ask questions!
Rather than finding out why people voted the way they did, Davis assumes the worst possible motives of people.
It does a disservice to the readers to cover an issue from only one point of view. That point of view might be interesting and have merit, but it is still only one.
Here’s hoping that the FXBG Advance can find their way back to publishing opinions with which they disagree, as they have done before many times on other topics, but never this one.
The Supreme Court of Virginia got it right? If anyone can explain how the ordinary rule of grammar contained on page 196 of the oft-cited case of Moore v. Pullem does not take the whole start-of-the-election question out of this redistricting case, please share it here.
Well-said.
This coverage has been so disappointing.
Plenty of people who hate gerrymandering in principle still voted for the redistricting amendment.
That mismatch in values and behavior seems interesting to me.
Is it just hypocrisy, as Davis alleges? Maybe talk to some people, ask questions!
Rather than finding out why people voted the way they did, Davis assumes the worst possible motives of people.
It does a disservice to the readers to cover an issue from only one point of view. That point of view might be interesting and have merit, but it is still only one.
Here’s hoping that the FXBG Advance can find their way back to publishing opinions with which they disagree, as they have done before many times on other topics, but never this one.