‘BIPARTISAN’ EVENT DISPLAYED ‘UNIPARTISAN’ MINDSET
By Del. Phillip A. Scott
This week, I attended the Hunt Institute’s Education Summit, which was organized by an interest group and hosted by House Democrats. The event was advertised as a "bipartisan" effort, aimed at addressing the pressing issues in our education system. However, it became clear very quickly that this was far from the truth. While I had hoped to engage in constructive dialogue and contribute to the conversation, the atmosphere was anything but open to diverse viewpoints.
Several of my Republican colleagues tried to ask questions and offer our perspectives, they were interrupted, dismissed, and effectively silenced. Any attempt to provide constructive dissent or challenge the dominant narrative was met with hostility. The voices of those we represent were silenced. It was disappointing to see such a lack of willingness to engage in meaningful debate, especially on an issue as critical as education.
Our students are struggling, and our schools are failing. We, as elected officials, have a responsibility to address these challenges head-on and work together to find real solutions. But when the other side shuts down debate and pushes their own dogmas without room for discussion, it’s our students who ultimately suffer.
On Monday, I made the decision, along with several of my Republican colleagues, to leave the summit early. We left not out of protest for the sake of disruption, but out of frustration for the unwillingness of the event organizers to truly engage with opposing views. We want to fix our schools. We want to lift up our students, and that requires collaboration, transparency, and a willingness to have hard conversations—even when we don’t all agree.
What happened at the summit is a perfect example of how shutting down dissent and refusing to hear different perspectives hurts our ability to solve problems. It’s not about being right or wrong; it’s about finding common ground for the sake of our children’s futures.
I remain committed to working on meaningful education reform that prioritizes students, empowers parents and addresses the core issues in our schools. But that can only happen if we are all willing to listen to each other and work together. This week’s experience only reinforces my belief that we need more open dialogue, not less, to truly make a difference.
Del. Phillip Scott represents the 63rd District in the Virginia House of Delegates
.
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit our website at the link that follows.
Support Award-winning, Locally Focused Journalism
The FXBG Advance cuts through the talking points to deliver both incisive and informative news about the issues, people, and organizations that daily affect your life. And we do it in a multi-partisan format that has no equal in this region. Over the past month, our reporting was:
First to report on a Spotsylvania School teacher arrested for bringing drugs onto campus.
First to report on new facility fees leveled by MWHC on patient bills.
First to detail controversial traffic numbers submitted by Stafford staff on the Buc-ee’s project
Provided extensive coverage of the cellphone bans that are sweeping local school districts.
And so much more, like Clay Jones, Drew Gallagher, Hank Silverberg, and more.
For just $8 a month, you can help support top-flight journalism that puts people over policies.
Your contributions 100% support our journalists.
Help us as we continue to grow!
We kinda of know the who. We know the when. And the where. We even know the what. Well, sorta.
But looks like the "how" sure is missing.
Who exactly hurt your feelings? How did they do it? For someone who has been entrusted with writing the laws of this fine state, this Delegate leaves out a lot of the specifics. I sure hope his bills aren't as lacking in substance.
Yes, we see your excuse. But the justification for it leaves a lot to be desired.
Moving on.