Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sue Sargeant's avatar

Part 5, Page 3 (8-13-25 FDC Mtg handout: 'Racism & Zoning):

homes that are geographically separated from the main downtown corridor by roads and geography, just like the FHA recommended.

This hyper concentration of apartments can cause lower health outcomes over time. In Richmond, there are blocks of "affordable housing" apartments that were built with no AC, no landscaping, no attention to mitigation of heat.

On current heat maps they are bright red, where more affluent areas, with mixed housing are so much cooler they read blue on a color map. Heat is a known killer and as climate change increases these areas will only get worse.

What can be done about this?

The historic impacts of direct and indirect racial and economic segregation will be hard to undo, but people are trying. Modern zoning trends have moved toward Form-Based zoning that allows for a better mix of multifamily and single-family homes based more on conformity of form rather than on occupancy.

An example of this would be a three-story apartment building with 6-12 apartments situated in a neighborhood that contains two and three-story homes as well as blocks of townhomes averaging 2 to 3 stories. This mix allows for people of various economic and social backgrounds to be able to live and enjoy the same amenities.

Reducing Parking minimums and height restrictions can help as well as reducing lot size requirements and setbacks.

But there are still a lot of pitfalls, and our city is not immune to them. Zoning can still be used to divide the haves from the have-nots if it's improperly applied. Zoning that regularly requires or allows exceptions is inherently economically biased. Asking for a zoning exception takes time and money, so it disproportionately benefits the wealthiest folks who can work the system to meet their needs.

Housing affordability in general is also a huge concern in our area, as land is naturally limited. Even if we build, building itself can cause affordability issues with developers motivated to make the most money possible and not to build for the masses.

We are limited in what we can do in Fredericksburg at this time to address this because of the Dillon Rule, which does not allow our city to create certain kinds of rules and regulations. A prime example of this is rent control or affordable housing requirements.

We do not have the ability to place these requirements on builders, and instead have to offer them carrots and incentives to motivate them, which do not always match their main economic motivations. Changing this at the state level may be possible in the coming years and would be helpful as costs continue to increase.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts