OPINION: Why Are Candidates Seeking Partisan Support?
The League of Women Voters to hold two Candidate Nights.
By Cathie Fisher Braman
President League of Women Voters of the Fredericksburg Area
For years the voters of Fredericksburg voted in May for the purpose of electing City Council, Treasurer, and the Sheriff to their respective offices. In 2022, then Governor Northam changed that - it became law that all elections for City and County offices would be in November. Fredericksburg changed its elections to November in the year 2023. This, it seems, has created a political furor that we have in the City this year.
Therefore, it is disappointing that a years’ long tradition has been violated. In the Editorial letter published in the Advance on July 14, 2025 written by Scott Vezina, the Fredericksburg Republican Chair, he claims that in March of 2023, Mayor Devine and Vice Mayor Frye both spoke about how hard the City had worked to keep the local elections non-partisan and their hope was to keep partisan politics out of the City elections.
What happened in the intervening years to change their minds and for most candidates to attend a partisan organization and seek their support?
Scott further claims in his article . . . “this is the second election in a row that non-partisan candidates have violated the City of Fredericksburg charter that requires local offices to run as non-partisan candidates. Furthermore, the Virginia Department of Elections states that, ‘Cities, either by charter or choice, have non-partisan city council and local elections.’”
According to a reading of the Fredericksburg Charter, there is in fact no mention of partisanship in local elections.
Let’s back up. In 2016 an overflow crowd met at the Central Rappahannock Regional Library, now known as the Fredericksburg Branch and unanimously voted to have a League of Women Voters League in the Fredericksburg Area. This National, State and local organization has been around for 100 years. It is, and always had been, a “Non-partisan” organization.
The Presidents of the National, State and Local Leagues do not attend meetings unless all representatives are at the table. That includes the Republican, the Democratic, the Independents and other parties who have candidates who will be on the ballot in the next election.
We don’t condone either party inviting these candidates to their meetings whether for a question and-answer forum or just a meet and greet.
What we do support is the candidates separating themselves from any party and representing their own Wards. City officials should remember the people they represent.
The history of this City is to keep a blind eye to politics. Candidates cannot assume everyone in their district are a Republican or a Democrat.
The League of Women Voters of the Fredericksburg Area will hold two Candidate Nights — one for the City Council and the other being a Meet and Greet for all local candidates. We endorse no candidate — we only bring to the City the hopes, dreams and aspirations of those wishing to seek office. May the candidates represent their Wards and Districts with the utmost integrity, and honesty.
September 11, 2025. Fredericksburg Branch Theatre. 6:30 p.m.
City Council CandidatesSeptember 29, 2025. Fredericksburg Branch Theatre. 6:30m p.m. Candidates Night Meet and Greet
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit the link that follows.
Support Award-winning, Locally Focused Journalism
The FXBG Advance cuts through the talking points to deliver both incisive and informative news about the issues, people, and organizations that daily affect your life. And we do it in a multi-partisan format that has no equal in this region. Over the past year, our reporting was:
First to break the story of Stafford Board of Supervisors dismissing a citizen library board member for “misconduct,” without informing the citizen or explaining what the person allegedly did wrong.
First to explain falling water levels in the Rappahannock Canal.
First to detail controversial traffic numbers submitted by Stafford staff on the Buc-ee’s project
Our media group also offers the most-extensive election coverage in the region and regular columnists like:
And our newsroom is led by the most-experienced and most-awarded journalists in the region — Adele Uphaus (Managing Editor and multiple VPA award-winner) and Martin Davis (Editor-in-Chief, 2022 Opinion Writer of the Year in Virginia and more than 25 years reporting from around the country and the world).
For just $8 a month, you can help support top-flight journalism that puts people over policies.
Your contributions 100% support our journalists.
Help us as we continue to grow!
This article is published under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. It can be distributed for noncommercial purposes and must include the following: “Published with permission by FXBG Advance.”
Thank you to Cathie Fisher Braman of the Fredericksburg League of Women Voters for writing this 'FXBG Advance' commentary about NON-PARTISAN LOCAL ELECTIONS in the city of Fredericksburg. I am a founding member of the Fredericksburg League and support it because I know I can get a NON-PARTISAN view of the issues that face all of us. Not just the Democrats, not just the GOPs, the Indpts. All of us.
I am a cradle Dem, influenced even in first grade by Franciscan nuns who were in love with JFK and wanted us to sense a moment in history of the first Catholic president. These nuns taught us JFK's campaign song 'High Hopes' (Frank Sinatra). For extra credit, we memorized and recited Robert Frost's 'Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Evening' in preparation for watching him recite his poem 'The Gift Outright' at JFK's inauguration.
I have knocked at least 40,000 area doors in support of Dem candidates since 2007. I am on the DPVA Dem Party of Virginia Central Committee and have served many years as Chair of the CD7 Women's Caucus, Secretary & Vice Chair of the Fred Dems.
With that being said, it is wrong of the Fredericksburg Democratic Committee to do the LOCAL endorsements. LOCAL endorsement ballot divides the city into political 'tribes'.
Since 2007, I've worked with many Fred Dem Chairs and Executive Boards.
Never have I seen such back-door manipulation by 'power players' who not only subvert the FDC Executive Board but get their people in place on the city's commissions/boards to muddle in the Dem influence on the City Council.
The Economic Development Authority is one example of how the local Dem party is controlling what happens in the city. Former EDA Chair Mitzi Brown (Councilor Jon Gerlach's wife) used to be able to name the EDA appointee directly to Council.
The EDA by-laws have since been rewritten to remove that power from the Chair. The by-laws now align with other city commissions/boards, so that the Chair is only allowed to serve notice to the Clerk of Council that there is 'a vacancy' on the EDA.
But prior to that EDA by-laws change, we have 'fox guarding the henhouse' DATA CENTER developer for Stack Infrastructure on it.
and not one Councilor or city official would respond to a member of the Fredericksburg Neighborhoods Coalition who filed a FOIA (Freedom of Info Act) requesting the name of the DC developer.
That DC developer name is not proprietary info. The University of Mary Washington students came through with the Stack name through extensive research of their FOIA emails and presented it at the 2-22-25 Student Climate Action Summit.
A few days later, on 2-25-25, the Council held its 'Done Deal' stacked vote, the usual 7-0 vote (all Democrats who will not tolerate any dissent on the dais), that the DC Performance Agreement Standards document was ready to vote on. Despite the Planning Commission on 2-12-25 voting NO (4-3), it wasn't ready.
Just one example of when one party dominates local government decisions.
It's unhealthy what's going on in the city because of one party domination on the dais. It has no 'balance' in which 'diversity of thought' is valued and more robust decisions are made in representing ALL stakeholders. Potholes in the city don't need a political party to fix it. Yet the 'virtue signalers' in the Fred Dems say potholes are based on Dem values.
Nah, 'gaslighting' begone. Not buying it. Just fix the darn pothole.
We now see that political party domination on the LOCAL dais leads to reduced accountability (resulting in more FOIAs, lawsuit), a lack of trust, a lack of representation for minority views, and policies that are misaligned with the community's broader interests, like 'balanced growth' in 22401 instead of this kowtowing to developers who use a 1891 Fredericksburg Development Company map to justify violating the Comp Plan zoning to get 'double the density' townhouses and soul-sucking 'big uglies' casting shadow on sidewalks right past the cemetery on William St.
In a one-party-dominated council, the majority faces little to no political opposition, which can erode the checks and balances critical to a healthy democracy. When this current Council got in, some of them crowed that they were there to represent the people who elected them. uh, no.
Part of the divide again. Cast us into political 'tribes' like this FDC endorsed ballot does.
Look at all the uncontested seats in the city. Know that the Fred Dems endorsement divides. Who would want to run in this environment?
Fred Dems endorsed ballot is the lazy candidate's way of getting a quick vote at the poll site without having to do extensive door-knocking like the non-endorsed candidates want to and are doing right now. The non-endorsed candidates have been out door-knocking since Jan 2's ice. Not measly efforts. Extensive. to listen to each voter at each door to hear their concerns.
They've also changed some voter's minds. when these voters hear the full story of what the endorsed candidates did not do or do not know because they don't have the time to devote to attending community meetings that have been happening for years.
Say NO to any candidate who takes the Fred Dem endorsed ballot (GOP says they're going to put out one in response. It's likely saber-rattling to get the Fred Dems to knock it off with theirs. They'll pull out when Fred Dems, the initiators of the divisive endorsed ballot, yank their endorsed ballot).
The following candidates are going to win anyway since they're the only ones running. Just don't vote for them if they allow the Fred Dems endorsement bubble by their name. To show them that it is wrong of them to take the FDC endorsed ballot.
If they put in a written request to Fred Dems to take their name off the 'endorsed' ballot, and there's no bubble by their name, then go ahead and vote for them.
Otherwise, 'no vote' them because they are part of the problem in dividing the city. Just like Mayor Kerry Devine's missed opportunity to start her term of office as a non-partisan Mayor. She was unopposed. It's a no-brainer: Don't take the FDC endorsement:
School Board Fred Dems endorsed candidates running unopposed:
Ward 1: Andy Wolfenbarger
Ward 2: Kathleen Pomeroy
Ward 4: Malvina Rollins Kay
How can constituents feel they're getting a fair hearing when the following two candidates are taking the Fred Dems endorsement? Endorsement from their professional organizations, sure. But a political party? NO. They need to get their name off the Fred Dems endorsed ballot.
Commonwealth's Attorney: Libby Humphries
Sheriff: Rashawn Cowles
Finally, the involvement of political parties in formally non-partisan races can have real-world implications. In August 2025, an endorsement by the Fredericksburg Democratic Committee was rescinded for two federal employees due to concerns about violating the Hatch Act, which restricts the political activities of federal workers.
According to an interpretation by the Office of Special Counsel, a partisan endorsement can make a non-partisan race effectively partisan under the Hatch Act.
Yank the endorsements Fred Dems, for all candidates. Do the right thing for the city.