The Theatre of the Absurd Needs to Yield
The voters opted for change in Spotsylvania - we're still a long way from it.
By Martin Davis
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
The election in November was a referendum on Board chaos. Tossed out of power were two of the four Board members who made up the majority voting bloc and supported burning books—Kirk Twigg (who lost by a 2-1 margin) and Rabih Abuismail (who chose not to run again). Open seats were filled by a political independent and educator (Belen Rodas) and another long-time public-school educator (Carol Medawar).
With Lorita Daniels holding her seat, decidedly pro-public-school members hold a 5-2 advantage. And key to their election victories was a promise to restore order and calm to the Board.
If last night’s Board meeting was any indication, however, we’re a long way from realizing calm anytime soon.
Turbulent Seas, Novice Pilot
April Gillespie and Lisa Phelps, unsurprising to those who watched their behavior the previous two years, are roiling the seas for the new leadership. Since the passing of the gavel, they’ve prolonged votes, belabored points, and left meetings early. Monday night, true to form, they walked out of a closed session meeting. Then needlessly prolonged what should have been a simple procedural vote.
Once the full Board returned to open session, Gillespie and Phelps forced an unnecessarily long discussion about voting to certify the closed session. Not satisfied to stop there, the two followed that up with a needlessly contentious discussion over pulling items from the consent agenda.
All totaled, what should have been a few relatively simple procedural votes became an almost-half-hour argument among Board members.
If Phelps especially was intentionally disruptive, however, it’s also true that Daniels is struggling to maintain control of the meetings.
She is new in the role of chair, so some grace is to be extended, but she is struggling with understanding Roberts Rules of Order, leans too heavily on her vice-chair for guidance, and has a difficult time handling contentious discussions in a firm, but even-handed manner.
Her lack of ability to control the meeting extends to managing members of the public.
The first speaker last night was an individual advocating for the students at John J. Wright and asking for resources to help maintain the building. At the prescribed three-minute mark, she was told her time was up. Saying she needed 30 seconds to wrap up, the chair agreed to let her proceed, after which she spoke for nearly four more minutes.
All in all, it’s a relatively minor misstep. People have the right to speak, but consistent application of rules is important that everyone has an equal opportunity. And when a school board has been as dysfunctional for as long as this one, it’s an easy way to show that you’re serious about restoring order.
Theatre of the Absurd
Perhaps not surprisingly, things went quickly downhill in public comments after the first speaker. Notable were the ad hominem attacks and threats leveled at Board members, both named and unnamed.
One speaker on Monday directly called out Gillespie and Phelps, then lectured them like so many three-year-olds. Yet, the chair allowed this blatant ad hominem attack to proceed unabated.
In another case, a speaker addressed themselves to that night’s Board process and called out members, though not by name, for their actions. To those present, it was clear that the targets, again, were Gillespie and Phelps.
It didn’t stop there. A grown man dressed in swim gear went on a conspiratorial rant that Oliver Stone would have marveled at. Though practically nothing spoken had anything to do with the school system, the chair allowed the rant to continue.
Another speaker went after another unnamed Board member, presumably Medawar, accusing her - incorrectly - of living outside the county and then intimidating the member by talk of private eyes and tailing them.
And still, the chair sat idly by and said nothing.
Gaining Control
In all the aforementioned cases, whether the speakers’ comments are right or wrong regarding their statements is secondary to the issue of appropriateness. No Board member should have to sit through ad hominem attacks and insults.
It is perfectly within the right of the Board chair to insist that members of the public refrain from such disparaging comments. (For a model of guidelines that conform to Roberts Rules of Order and appropriately define proper behavior, see this write-up of how the Village of Kenilworth in Illinois handles public comments.)
The concern about where this school Board is headed, however, does not stop with the actions of the chair and the Board members.
It also falls on the shoulders of those who spoke loudly in November about their dissatisfaction with the chaos that has defined - and derailed - this school system.
The previous Board is in the rearview mirror - firmly where voters said that it belongs. At what point will this community stop talking about what the old Board did, and start talking about the many challenges facing the district in moving ahead?
Let’s be clear - I am not advocating limiting speech in order to gain control. Quite the opposite.
People continue to come to the Board meeting dressed like an amateur vacationing snorkeler and ramble for three minutes, as happened last night, or level ad hominem attacks, because too few people are showing up to offer constructive advice about how to move forward.
Democracy, as the saying go, is a verb. Voters acted in November, but their role is not over. Let them come before the Board to express their concerns, their issues, and their ideas for a better school system.
Such talk was not totally absent on Monday night.
The most important comment last night may well have been from the individual who talked about bus drivers’ inability to use the restrooms in the schools they serve because they don’t have access to the buildings.
It’s a relatively small issue in the grand scheme of things that can be easily addressed. But considerably more children’s daily lives will be made a little better because of this one suggestion than will be improved by the nastiness we’ve too long had to put up with.
This is why public comments exist. To find solutions to problems, large and small, that the public believes should be brought to the table.
This Board needs more of that kind of public comment.
And when more of those who voted for change in November begin speaking out during public comments with ideas for change and insights into the issues before the Board, those holding court in the theatre of the absurd will find a new arena to air their frustrations.
It’s time the public arena be taken back, and made constructive again, by those whose first concern is rebuilding a school system that has been badly damaged.
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit our website at the link that follows.
Weather and Traffic
Support Award-winning, Locally Focused Journalism
In less than a year, FXBG Advance has become the news leader in Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania, and Stafford through its innovative mix of:
Twice-daily newsletter - At 6 AM and 5 PM every Monday through Friday, the Advance brings the most important news directly to your inbox.
Education Reporting - Adele Uphaus has won multiple awards for her coverage of education issues locally and across the state. Now, she brings her experience, insights, and expertise to the Advance, providing our citizens some of the finest education writing and reporting in the commonwealth.
Political Reporting - From council meetings to campaigns, and fundraising to finance, the Advance is returning the Fourth Estate to its rightful place as a government watch dog.
Breaking News - From court cases to high-profile government moves, the Advance is the first to inform residents.
Investigative Journalism - Last year, the Advance broke major stories around improperly filed election documents, misleading sample ballots, disenfranchising Spotsylvania Count School parents, and book bans.
Election Coverage - The Advance offered the most complete coverage of the 2023 election, with in-depth candidate profiles, daily tracking of events, leading debates, and pre-dawn to post-midnight Election Day coverage. And 2024 brings even greater coverage.
Spotlights - From local businesses to nonprofit organizations and regional leaders, the Advance brings the people who make things happen to your attention.
Multi-partisan Commentary - Martin Davis is a 20-plus-year journalist recognized for superior commentary and political writing; Shaun Kenney has his hands on the pulse of political leaders across the Commonwealth. Together, they bring an unparalleled level of analysis and insight into the issues that drive debate in our region.
Political Cartoons - Clay Jones is a nationally recognized talent who draws weekly for CNN. He has returned to Fredericksburg to level his critical eye and razor-sharp drawing at the topics which make us both laugh, and look closer at ourselves.
New Dominion Podcast - Each week, Martin Davis and Shaun Kenney interview guests from across the region and the state. Growing to over 1,000 listeners in just six months, NDP has become a leading force in political, cultural, and social discussion.
We thank each and every one of you who have made the Advance a part of your day, and we’re excited to say that more-exciting announcements are just around the corner as we continue to innovate and expand our coverage of the region.
The donations of individual readers have made this year possible. Please join the hundreds who are supporting excellence in journalism by subscribing for just $8 a month.
Where does your money go?
It goes to support the great journalists we have - like Adele Uphaus - and the ones we look to hire in the year ahead.
If you can spare $8 a month, we’ll be both grateful, and reward your trust in us with more journalism, more stories, and more connections to organizations and people who make our region a great place to live.
If you can’t, thank you for reading the FXBG Advance!, and consider sharing us with your friends.
In 2024, let’s build an even better Advance - together!
Thank you for reading and supporting FXBG Advance.
-Martin Davis, Editor-in-Chief
I'm not sure whether my comments at Monday night's board meeting were targeted in this article but if that's the case I stand by them. My comments were specific to procedure. Prior to speaking I had emailed my board member, Ms. Cole, with my concerns and I included a cc to each member and to acting superintendent Guempel. I asked for a response to all in my cc as to whether they were in receipt of the email.
One may wonder why I believed that request necessary. For the past two years my emails, which were not frequent but were sent on occasion, were not addressed by the superintendent or the majority of the board. I believe my concern is significant I wanted to know if it was read and not merely deleted by board members.
My concern is how closed session is handled and it is valid concern. I'm not an attorney and don't pretend to be. I have however looked through VA code in an attempt to find whether this is addressed by VA law. I am concerned that members are allowed to attend closed session remotely, specifically by phone. I asked that if this is required by VA Code to please inform me of that. From what I can tell, VA code allows for remote attendance but does not require it. If that's the case, my ask is that the board prohibit remote attendance in closed session.
It is my understanding that closed session is intended for the board to discuss and consider confidential matters including hirings, firings, and other HR issues, to address disciplinary actions to include those involving students, and to seek legal counsel on confidential matters. Students, staff, and board members should have their privacy protected. How can that be insured if members attend remotely? There's no guarantee the member attending remotely is alone during the meeting and there is no guarantee the closed meeting is not being recorded if someone attends by phone. The opportunity for a breach of confidentiality exists and should be mitigated.
My concern about this matter was heightened after the new board took over in January. During January's meeting one of the members attended remotely. Additionally, it has been allowed for members to vote to certify closed session when they were not in attendance for all or part of the session.
Per my email to Ms. Cole with a cc regarding this matter and a reminder email about the same issue a few days prior to the meeting, I received respectful responses of receipt from the acting superintendent and five of the members. Neither the acting superintendent nor the members who responded made promises of action though some did write that they understand and/or share my concerns. Mrs. Phelps and Mrs. Gillespie did not respond.
I agree that meetings need to be controlled and civil. I also believe that some of this can be handled not only through Robert's Rules of Order but through school board policy, including who is allowed to speak at meetings and what the parameters are for civil discussion. However, the parents, students, and voters in Spotsylvania do have a right, and indeed a responsibility, to weigh in on matters of importance and how that may relate to school board policy, including privacy protections for students, staff, and board members.
I stand by my public comments and hope this will be addressed in a public explanation of VA code regarding closed session attendance and, if allowed by VA code, by a motion to change school board policy to dictate attendance and participation in closed session.
Everyone should read the guidelines from the Village in Illinois...and how they will run their meetings. Expectations for public comments are clear and how the "presider" or chair will handle all comments and time limits! GREAT SUGGESTION Marty!!