FEATURE: W.E.B. Du Bois, Black History Month and the importance of African AmericanĀ studies
by Chad Williams, the Samuel J. and Augusta Spector Professor of History and African and African American Studies, Brandeis University. This article was originally published in The Conversation.
PHOTO CREDIT: Public Domain: W.E.B. DuBois by Laura W. Waring (NARA) by pingnews.com is marked with Public Domain Mark 1.0.
***
The opening days of Black History Month 2023 have coincided with controversy about the teaching and broader meaning of African American studies.
On Feb. 1, 2023, the College Board released a revised curriculum for its newly developed Advanced Placement African American studies course.
Critics have accused the College Board of caving to political pressure stemming from conservative backlash and the decision of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to ban the course from public high schools in Florida because of what he characterized as its radical content and inclusion of topics such as critical race theory, reparations and the Black Lives Matter movement.
On Feb. 11, 1951, an article by the 82-year-old Black scholar-activist W.E.B. Du Bois titled āNegro History Weekā appeared in the short-lived New York newspaper The Daily Compass.
As one of the founders of the NAACP in 1909 and the editor of its powerful magazine The Crisis, Du Bois is considered by historians and intellectuals from many academic disciplines as Americaās preeminent thinker on race. His thoughts and opinions still carry weight throughout the world.
Du Boisā words in that 1951 article are especially prescient today, offering a reminder about the importance of Black History Month and what is at stake in current conversations about African American studies.
Du Bois began his Daily Compass commentary by praising Carter G. Woodson, founder of the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History, who established Negro History Week in 1926. The week would eventually become Black History Month.
Woodson was the second African American to earn a doctorate in history from Harvard University. Du Bois was the first.
Du Bois and Woodson did not always see eye to eye. However, as I explore in my new book, āThe Wounded World: W.E.B. Du Bois and the First World War,ā the two pioneering scholars always respected each other.
Reckoning with history and reclaiming the past
Du Boisā connection to and appreciation of Negro History Week grew during the late 1940s and throughout the 1950s. During this time, whether in public speeches or published articles, he never missed an opportunity to acknowledge the importance of Negro History Week.
In the Feb. 11, 1951, article, Du Bois reflected that his own contributions to Negro History Week ālay in my long effort as a historian and sociologist to make America and Negroes themselves aware of the significant facts of Negro history.ā
Summarizing his work from his first book, āThe Suppression of the African Slave-Trade,ā published in 1896, through his magnum opus āBlack Reconstruction in America,ā published in 1935, Du Bois told readers of the Daily Compass piece that much of his career was spent trying āto correct the distortion of history in regard to Negro enfranchisement.ā
By doing so, the nation would hopefully become, Du Bois wrote further, āconscious that this part of our citizenry were normal human beings who had served the nation credibly and were still being deprived of their credit by ignorant and prejudiced historians.ā
In addition to championing Negro History Week, Du Bois applauded other Black scholars, like E. Franklin Frazier, Charles Johnson and Shirley Graham, who were āsteadily attackingā the omissions and distortions of Black people in school textbooks.
Du Bois went on to chronicle the achievements of African Americans in science, religion, art, literature and the military, making clear that Black people had a history to be proud of.
Du Bois, however, questioned what deeper meaning these achievements held to the issues facing Black people in the present.
āWhat now does Negro History Week stand for?ā he asked in the 1951 article. āShall American Negroes continue to learn to be āproudā of themselves, or is there a higher broader aim for their research and study?ā
āIn other words,ā he asserted, āas it becomes more universally known what Negroes contributed to America in the past, more must logically be said and taught concerning the future.ā
The time had come, Du Bois believed, for African Americans to stop striving to be merely āthe equal of white Americans.ā
Black people needed to cease emulating the worst traits of America ā flamboyance, individualism, greed and financial success at any cost ā and support labor unions, Pan-Africanism and anti-colonial struggle.
He especially encouraged the systematic study of the imperial and economic roots of racism: āHere is a field for Negro History Week.ā
Black history and Black struggle
Looking ahead, Du Bois declared that if Negro History Week remained ātrue to the ideals of Carter Woodsonā and followed āthe logical development of the Negro Race in America,ā it would not confine itself to the study of the past nor āboasting and vainglory over what we have accomplished.ā
āIt will not mistake wealth as the measure of America, nor big-business and noise as World Domination,ā Du Bois wrote in his article.
Instead, Du Bois believed Negro History Week would āconcentrate on study of the present,ā ānot be afraid of radical literatureā and, above all else, advocate for peace and voice āeternal opposition against war between the white and colored peoples of the earth.ā
Were he alive today, Du Bois would certainly have much to say about current debates around the teaching of African American history and the larger significance of African American studies. Du Bois died on Aug. 27, 1963, in Accra, Ghana.
But he left behind his clairvoyant words that remind us of the connections between African American studies and movements for Black liberation, along with how the teaching of African American history has always challenged racist and exclusionary narratives of the nationās past.
Du Bois also reminds us that Black History Month is rooted in a legacy of activism and resistance, one that continues in the present.
PREVIEW: An Honest Discussion - Education
In the first issue of F2S, four principles were set forth. The second had to do with public discourse. Itās worth repeating:
Problem-solving, not left and right ā The acerbic nature of public discourse stems from the divisive language of campaigns that have become a nonstop reality in todayās world. This obsession with elections continuously forces us to frame problems in terms of ideology. We believe itās most important to frame issues in terms of problem-solving.
In that spirit, tomorrow will mark the introduction of a new feature: An Honest Discussion.
Published over a number of issues, this feature will showcase two prominent local thinkers having an honest discussion about the most-divisive issues in our community.
The first topic will be education and feature Shaun Kenney and Martin Davis.
Shaun is an instructor at St. Michael Catholic School in Spotsylvania, vice president for American Life League, and a former executive director of the Republican Party of Virginia.Ā He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Virginia and is presently a graduate student in philosophy at the Catholic University of America.
Martin is the founder of F2S and a middle school history teacher. He is previously opinion editor of the Free Lance-Star newspaper in Fredericksburg and has reported nationally on education issues for Philanthropy, National Journal, and The Christian Science Monitor among other publications. He holds a B.A. from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, an M.A. from the University of Chicago, and was a doctoral student at the University of South Carolina.
In Thursdayās edition, we will explore how the debate is framed, before launching into a deeper discussion.
Thank you for proving my point.
Gee?! Could you select a more polarizing person?! If this is to be a true and honest conversation of divisive issues why would you select the person responsible for creating and perpetuating the divisiveness?! Why not select a person or persons affected by the deeds and words spread by the divisiveness? Our community has members of multiple faiths. How will your choice represent their voices?