Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dawn Shelley's avatar

Be careful with these numbers for Spotsylvania. They aren't telling the whole story. There are vacancies being filled by non-teachers (interim teachers). At last night's meeting it was noted that the vacancy rate would be over 5% if the interim teachers were considered vacancies. There are long-term substitutes, as well, that weren't mentioned.

Please excuse any typos; I couldn't scroll back up to review my comment from my phone.

Expand full comment
Becky Murray's avatar

Always read the fine print and look for spin. Data may not always be what it appears at first glance.

We expect our attorneys to be fully licensed, right? Our physicians? Our hairdressers? Our plumbers? But we're asked to accept that public teacher licensure is optional?

What we, the general public and those who are of the belief that public education is vital, are being asked to do is to recognize the problem, a teacher shortage, but rather than solving the problem we're being asked to lower standards and hope for the best. We're expected to accept that students are being taught by those who may not even hold an bachelor's degree. Interim teachers in SCPS are only required to have an associate's degree or the equivalent of two years of college, They are not required to be licensed or even just a few months away from full licensure. We're to expect long-term subs and interim teachers as the norm rather than a temporary solution. We in Spotsylvania are asked to accept that the district has partnered with a private Christian university to fast track master's degrees. Who's willing for their physician not to have a medical degree or a professional license? Who wants a nurse practitioner without documentation of a professional license?

We're told that mentors will be working with those unlicensed and in some cases undereducated people teaching our students. Mentors (licensed and currently employed teachers) are great and necessary for all beginning teachers but it's not an easy job and possibly more difficult when the mentee doesn't have basic professional training. We're to accept and expect our already overworked and underpaid career teachers to add another very time-consuming and difficult task to their already full plates and not blink an eye or produce anything but high student test scores. Yes, mentors are compensated, but not nearly enough for their professional experience or for the amount of work mentoring requires (while simultaneously working their full time teaching job). We're to accept that mentors who volunteer (or I suspect are often "voluntold") to assume this great responsibility aren't doing it for "the pay." What could go wrong?

Rather than dig deep as to WHY we have a teacher shortage we're willing to turn our collective heads and further disrespect the professional training and education of career teachers. Rather than acknowledge that teachers are leaving the field because of high professional and personal demands, lack of support and general respect, and pay so low that they often have to have second or third jobs to afford housing and basic needs for their families, we've decided to lower standards for professional employment and put the onus on the shoulders of the current professionals who have stayed in the trenches. Again, what could go wrong?

Until we as a nation commit to respect and PAY our public school educators what they're worth and demand that our public schools are staffed by licensed and prepared teachers, we're most likely not going to have the results we need.

What does that require? Funding. What does that mean? In Virginia it means putting pressure on local and state lawmakers. In Spotsylvania our local purse strings come from the board of supervisors. We need them to stop making excuses and engaging in political pandering and fund our public schools. Will that happen? I'm going to follow the advice of my licensed physician and not hold my breath.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts