Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phil Huber's avatar

Public debate on immigration is saturated with morality tales about desperate families, “open borders,” and “invasions,” but it rarely explains how today’s elected and appointed officials are structuring this crisis. Much of the media frames immigration as a clash of values—cruelty versus compassion, law and order versus humanitarian concern—without spelling out how Congress, the current administration, and the courts are jointly responsible for the chaos.

Congress, under both parties, has failed for decades to pass basic updates to immigration law, even though everyone knows the system’s quotas, categories, and procedures no longer match economic needs or global displacement realities. Instead of doing the hard work of legislating, today’s Congress often uses immigration as a campaign weapon, highlighting tragedies at the border while blocking workable compromises. That inaction forces presidents to govern by executive orders and agency rules, pushing the current administration, like its predecessors, to stretch enforcement and humanitarian tools right up to legal limits.

The courts then step in, not as moral referees, but as emergency managers—deciding, case by case, which executive actions stand and which fall. This produces abrupt policy swings and leaves the public with headlines about “wins” and “losses,” rather than a clear sense of what a just, durable framework would look like.

I recommend future immigration articles explain the failures in Congress, the White House, and the judiciary, otherwise citizens are denied the full picture—and the system remains broken by design. Migrants will continue to be denied just, humane, and dignified treatment, and due process. We need this information to hold our elected officials to their responsibilities.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?