7 Comments
User's avatar
Robert Keith Thomas's avatar

If MWHC does not want to pay real estate or corporate taxes, why not ask them to make annual donations to cover some of the costs that the city incurs? There is also the lost income from the lack of development on their site.

Expand full comment
Leo B Watkins's avatar

There it is......

Expand full comment
Shaun Kenney's avatar

Yup -- there it is.

Expand full comment
Leigh Anne Van Doren's avatar

Who will be living in the Snowden House? If it’s residential?

Expand full comment
Mary and Erik Nelson's avatar

Before we write off the mansion, let's remember its context. There were four prominent ante-bellum dwellings built on the hills surrounding Fredericksburg. From north to south, they are Fall Hill, Snowden, Brompton, and Braehead. Each of these houses is exceptionally well cared for, but Snowden is the most visually prominent. So what we have in town is an intact assemblage of resources that are historically important both individually as well as collectively. By all means, Mary Washington Healthcare should proceed with its plans, but we all remember when Mary Washington College built its alumni center on top of Trench Hill without bothering with the necessary environmental assessment that would have at least identified and mapped the Civil War earthworks there. Mary Washington Healthcare is a different animal and it will not be difficult to construct the needed additions while respecting the old mansion's visual prominence (even if it was rebuilt after a fire in the 1920s).

Expand full comment
Helen P. Ross's avatar

Major error - take note - there was a fire that destroyed the original house, Snowden, in 1926. There is a small structure still standing behind the rebuilt Snowden that predated Civil War but that’s about it.

Expand full comment
Adele Uphaus's avatar

Thanks Helen, I will update that!

Expand full comment