OPINION: The Hylton Tract and the November Election
Let's save the last piece of undeveloped land in the city.
By Jay Brock
GUEST WRITER
What does an 84-acre forest have to do with a (suddenly partisan) city election that will determine how Fredericksburg will grow in the coming decades?
Plenty, it turns out, especially in an election year where uncontrolled growth has been a major policy issue for the city and area residents (if you’re not sure what I’m talking about, just look at all the traffic plaguing the area as a reflection of how poorly planned growth in the Fredericksburg region has been of late).
I’m talking about the Hylton Tract, the many beautiful untouched wooded acres of pristine forest in the city along Cowan Boulevard.
It’s one of the last few undeveloped parcels in the city, and it’s a unique resource that should not be squandered in the name of progress, growth, profit, or political convenience.
As anyone who has lived near this forest, or walked in its natural beauty, or taken the time when driving past it to take a good look, there is a quiet, a grace of the dark woods, the linking with nature that is missing in so much of our lives.
A quick look at the FXBG website reveals that this is also hallowed ground: there was “hard fighting” in this tract in May, 1863 during the Battle of Chancellorsville in the American Civil War.
Now, as with many other undeveloped parcels within any growing jurisdiction, there are plans to develop this land.
There are three main options for the Hylton Tract:
First: There is talk of putting up more housing. Which of course means more congestion, more traffic, higher city expenses for each new resident, and higher taxes.
Second: There is talk of commercially developing this space, including placing another data center to add to those already approved by council. These centers promise future tax revenues, but there are worries about the availability of electric power—and its increased costs—as well as potential conflicts when it comes to city residents needing to share with these data centers what might be a limited availability of water in the future.
Then there is the third option, which makes the most sense: keeping this land as natural as possible, either as public park space, or keep it as a forest park, for every city resident to enjoy.
And not just current residents, and their children, but of course for future generations of city residents and THEIR children…for generations to come.
Where would the money come from for the city to purchase this property and keep it in perpetuity as a natural resource?
According to city officials, the new Data Center development near Central Park will add about another $60 million/year in tax revenue to the yearly budget (now $137 million).
That’s ample funding to purchase this tract and preserve it as a natural resource for the city in perpetuity—and an excellent use of those dollars.
Why preserve the land rather than develop it?
Every Fredericksburg resident understands full well that the city can develop to the point where it has too much congestion. Too much noise. Too much pollution. Too much traffic. Too much of growth that is too expensive for the city — and its residents through higher taxes— to sustain. Some think we’ve already passed that point: that we already have too much development.
I greatly doubt that there will be many who live here who will say that there can be too much forest, too much parkland for city residents to enjoy, too much serenity, too much natural quiet, too many trees, too much green space, too much natural beauty in the city that this unspoiled tract of woods represents.
Why is this an important election? It will be up to city council to decide whether it will allow this land to be developed commercially or residentially, with all the attendant ills (congestion, anyone?) that will result—or to preserve and protect the Hylton Tract forest for current and future residents.
How will city council candidates want to be remembered? As someone who saved the Hylton Tract for future generations? Or who allowed more of the same old development that has turned the region into yet another example of urban sprawl?
This city election is one where some have tried to turn it into a partisan contest, where loyalty to Party is more important than policy. Before voting, consider finding out what the city council candidates in your ward envisions for this pristine tract: put more houses, more offices, more retail, more traffic onto this land, or keep it for the future enjoyment of your family, now and forever.
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit the link that follows.
Support Award-winning, Locally Focused Journalism
The FXBG Advance cuts through the talking points to deliver both incisive and informative news about the issues, people, and organizations that daily affect your life. And we do it in a multi-partisan format that has no equal in this region. Over the past year, our reporting was:
First to break the story of Stafford Board of Supervisors dismissing a citizen library board member for “misconduct,” without informing the citizen or explaining what the person allegedly did wrong.
First to explain falling water levels in the Rappahannock Canal.
First to detail controversial traffic numbers submitted by Stafford staff on the Buc-ee’s project
Our media group also offers the most-extensive election coverage in the region and regular columnists like:
And our newsroom is led by the most-experienced and most-awarded journalists in the region — Adele Uphaus (Managing Editor and multiple VPA award-winner) and Martin Davis (Editor-in-Chief, 2022 Opinion Writer of the Year in Virginia and more than 25 years reporting from around the country and the world).
For just $8 a month, you can help support top-flight journalism that puts people over policies.
Your contributions 100% support our journalists.
Help us as we continue to grow!
This article is published under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. It can be distributed for noncommercial purposes and must include the following: “Published with permission by FXBG Advance.”














Before we invest our tax dollars in keeping land unused, let's spend a lot more of them on bringing the public schools up to the same standards as surrounding counties. Right now teachers may live in the city but are forced to commute to jobs that pay a decent wage. School test results will never improve until there are sufficient funds to support them.
Part 1 comment Sue Sgt: Thanks Jay Brock for advocating for PARK USE for the HYLTON TRACT and to the 'FXBG Advance' for publishing Jay's letter. Activism at its finest.
As per the 1500 Gateway Project application for the Hylton tract, 4 DATA CENTERS are proposed on the property. They will be within 200 ft of residences in the Great Oaks neighborhood, where Ward 3 Councilor-appointee Susanna Finn lives.
Ms. Finn voted in favor of the Technology Overlay District/TOD for 8-12 DATA CENTERS in the CVA project: 'Celebrate Virginia' in Central Park near the Wegman's and the Fred Nats ballpark.
First as the Planning Commission Chair in Feb 2025. Despite 4 other Planning Commissioners saying NO! 4-3 (majority NO!) that the Performance Agreement Standards for the TOD were not ready and with concerns that she and two others wanted BYRIGHT development out of 'fear' that they would lose the client/applicant. Silver Companies working with STACK INFRASTRUCTURE.
STACK INFRASTRUCTURE already had an in to the local DATA CENTER market by making sure Kevin Hughes with STACK INFRASTRUCTURE got on the Fredericksburg Economic Development Authority,
Bill Wright, the activist in Prince William who is one of the community leaders to push back, mobilize the residents in a David v. Goliath scenario of Prince William becoming 'The DATA CENTER Capital of the World' with its Digital Gateway, shared with Fredericksburg Neighborhoods Coalition that this is one of the DATA CENTER head honchos slick marketing MOs. Get on a local governing board or committee.
Their PW Bd of Supervisors allowed a Citizen Advisory Board for study of DATA CENTERS. However, the DATA CENTER admins pushed into the meetings so that no Action Steps by the citizens could get passed. Kevin Hughes, STACK INFRASTRUCTURE was one of those reps on the PW Citizen Advisory Board: DATA CENTERS.
Due to pushback, the PW residents on the Citizen Advisory Board were able to convince the PW Bd of Supervisors to kick off every DATA CENTER head honcho rep. including STACK INFRASTRUCTURE.
So they could speak up for the residents having to live near these noisy DATA CENTERS and instead be able to talk about e.g., Special Use Permits, instead of BYRIGHT.
Second, As Ward 3 Councilor-appointee, Susanna Finn, then voted a few weeks later at the 2-25-25 Council Meeting for the Technology Overlay District for 8-12 DATA CENTERS to be built BYRIGHT at 'Celebrate Virginia'.
PTA mommies and naive groups of residents came out wearing James Monroe black and orange big buttons on 2-25-25 braying 'I Support Data Centers'. They were 'played' as per another of the billion-dollar DATA CENTER industry's MO.
This 'SOCIALIZING THE BENEFITS OF DATA CENTERS' is documented in a 10-1-2024; 1:42 PM email exchange (obtained via Fredericksburg Neighborhood Coalition member/residents chipping in to pay the $400. FOIA fee -Freedom of Info Act).
This 10-1-2024 email is with Ward 2 Councilor Jon Gerlach and Curry Roberts, University of Mary Washington Fredericksburg Regional Alliance:
"The purpose of this is to host a Building Construction Trades Council meeting in Fredericksburg to begin socializing the benefits of potential data center development in the City of Fredericksburg. Don Slaiman with IBEW Local 26 will be coordinating with the other Unions. Can you also propose an agenda Don?
Joel (Brittany), could we utilize the event space connected with Castiglia’s at a reduced charge? Could you have someone reach out to Don about food, which the FRA is willing to contribute towards? Kevin, would Stack be willing to contribute as well?
Joel and Kevin, we have Jon Gerlach and Chuck Frye attending from City Council for this one. Are you the two best to participate from the EDA? If it is more than two people from either body, it would make it a public meeting.
We would also like to invite some potentially allied groups who might be interested in learning about the significant job creation and tax benefits to the City. Two groups mentioned were representatives of the City teachers organization and the NAACP. Jon, can you and Chuck help with the NAACP? Kevin, can you speak with Jannan about who we should invite from the teachers association? The one time I spoke with her, she suggested the PTA as well".
With all this behind-the-scenes work to get to the 'aggressive' (the city's words) timeline to hurry up and pass the TOD/Technology Overlay District at Celebrate VA, the supporters of DATA CENTERS came out to bray about the money the schools would get. and it's for the children, our children, the schools need the money, the children are our future, we've got to have DATA CENTERS for the children!'.
Not one of them mentioned the historically 'equity-denied' children and families living within 200 ft of those noisy DATA CENTERS at 'Celebrate Virginia'. The ones 'the other' who are targeted for oppression by systemic discrimination.
Not one of them mentioned the seniors in 'Jubilation' who would also be experiencing the chronic noise emitted by these DATA CENTERS within 200 ft of their homes and play/recreation areas. Not one of them.
Not one of them asked themselves, 'What if this were my child? my grandparent?'
After the 2-25-25 vote by ALL 7-0s Councilors, some of the residents who naively spoke at that night's public comment mic ran to catch up on the Hanover St sidewalk with FNC members leaving the Council meeting, as if in 'shell shock', some apologizing, to say that they didn't know the DATA CENTERS were going to be so close to the children living in the apartments at Celebrate Virginia.
A privately funded Bee and Butterfly baseline study on their behavior near the Prince William DATA CENTER Gateway is underway. No results are out.
The Virginia General Assembly 12-9-2024 report by JLARC Joint Legislative Audit Review Committee states that: DATA CENTERS should be located in Industrial zones and 1000 ft away from residences.
There is no data out there yet which shows the harm of constant 24-7 noise of living within 200 ft of these DATA CENTERS.
The Friends of the Rappahannock went on record at the mic that they were NOT in support of the TOD/Technology Overlay District. Shortly after the 2-25-25 'We're ALL In!' 7-0 Councilor Vote, American Rivers named 'The Rappahannock River as the 6th Most Endangered River in the US'.
There is one study to show that the billion-dollar DATA CENTER industry selects their DATA CENTERS sites next to endangered rivers, rather than the healthy ones, in an effort to deflect the diminishing water supply off them as sucking out the water, (e.g., 33% of the 'evaporative' water is not returned to the river.
There is no agreement in Planning District 16 (city of Fred, Caroline, King George, Spotsy, Stafford on the amount of water they will be taking from the Rappahannock River for their DATA CENTERS.
Another expensive FOIA/Freedom of Info Act request by students at the University of Mary Washington gave some info, e.,g that STACK INFRASTRUCTURE was the DATA CENTER developer.
This info was presented by students at the 2-22-25 UMW Youth Climate Action Summit. The city wrongly refused to release this info as 'proprietary info' until AFTER the 2-25-25 Council vote for BYRIGHT DATA CENTERS in the TOD/Technology Overlay District at 'Celebrate VA'.
The Water Usage is 'redacted' in the FOIA (blacked out).
Fredericksburg Neighborhood Coalition members and Anne Little, Matt Kelly drove up to the same DATA CENTER sites as the Councilors did in Jan 2025.
However, activist Bill Wright told us not to fall for the DATA CENTER admin ploy, as the FXBG Councilors did, to take Councilors to the roof top.
That was so they wouldn't realize that it is not about the 70dB level of the DATA CENTERS. It is about the DATA CENTERS running CONSTANTLY.
So Mayor Kerry Devine referenced in her DATA CENTER Comparison Chart (google it and City of FXBG, VA to see it) and spoke to the decibel level at the 1-29-2025 Community Forum on DATA CENTERS:
This Community Forum had to be sponsored by 'Inform Fredericksburg' and the Sierra Club. Dorothy Hart CC Room Rental was paid by residents, mainly Anne Little, because the city would NOT have any community meetings on DATA CENTERS Basic Info 101.
Mayor Kerry wrote in her Comparison Chart: 70dB: the sound of a 'normal' conversation.
It's not the 70dB level. It is the 70dB CONSTANT 24-7 noise:
It's documented in residents' quotes in a variety of NoVA online news sources: The constant DATA CENTER noise is giving children headaches as they play outside and struggle to sleep at night with DATA CENTERS within 200 ft of their backyards.