Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Phil Huber's avatar

The Venezuela strike is not a one-off aberration; it is a vivid expression of a larger project that fuses executive overreach, oligarchic ambition, and a willingness to discard both constitutional limits and international law. Senator Tim Kaine is right to insist that this is an “illegal war” and that Congress has surrendered its core duty to decide when the nation goes to war. But to understand how dangerous this moment is, we have to place it in the broader strategy that has been hiding in plain sight.

In recent years, elites aligned with Project 2025 and similar blueprints have mapped out an American future in which democratic checks are treated as obstacles to be neutralized, not guardrails to be respected. These documents imagine a presidency unbound by traditional constraints, a bureaucracy purged and made personally loyal, and courts reshaped to ratify an aggressive “unitary executive” theory. As Anne Applebaum argues in Autocracy, Inc., twenty‑first‑century strongmen and their oligarch’s function less as isolated dictators and more as a global corporation of autocracy, using financial loopholes, propaganda, and mutual protection to entrench their power and wealth while rewriting the rules of the international system in their favor. Layered on top of that is the U.S. 2025 National Security Strategy explicitly carves the globe into spheres of influence where favored leaders and oligarchs are free to extract wealth with minimal interference, so long as they align with Washington’s power project.

What is playing out in Venezuela looks disturbingly like that model in action: a resource-rich country treated as a spoil of war; a people reduced to pawns in a contest over oil, contracts, and geopolitical bragging rights; and neighboring states warned to fall in line or risk similar treatment. This is not the rule of law; it is a privatized imperialism in which public power is deployed for private gain.

Congress is supposed to be the first line of defense against such abuse. The war power, the purse, and the impeachment power exist precisely so that no president can unilaterally plunge the country into wars of choice or convert the state into an instrument of oligarchic plunder. The Supreme Court, too, has a constitutional duty: to reject theories that turn the president into an elected monarch, and to defend the fundamental principle that no one is above the law.

None of that will happen by itself. It is time to organize more deeply, protest more visibly, and take back Congress in this year’s elections so that constitutional checks, and not oligarchic greed, set the course of American power.

Expand full comment
Leo B Watkins's avatar

Again, as happens with most editorials from a certain local writer I could mention.....ahem...... while Senator Kaine's statement is true, what's NOT said in the spirit of "bipartisanship" (read appeasement) is that these arrogant, horrendous actions of illegality and empire building did not happen in a vacuum.

Although, like most actions by this cynical administration, they occurred with an eye toward when they would be under the least media scrutiny (weekend/holiday), were announced after the fact, even to Congress, rather than before - and happened when they could provide the most distraction from other actions by Trump - such as the recent, court ordered data dump of some of the files showing his lies regarding his ward, Epstein, who conveniently died under his care - the fact is this administration has been quite open about their intent to do exactly what they did.

They published a strategic paper months ago that clearly stated they were abandoning international principles of law and we would now become a robber nation, stealing from others in our hemisphere while ignoring such actions by other totalitarian states such as Russia and China.

And not only have local Republican Congressional members such as Wittman and Cline become complicit in their silence, along with their party leaders such as Johnson, Scott, Graham, Jordan, et.al.; we can no longer pretend and give a pass to the local members of that party which have chosen to ride along and pretend these atrocities have nothing to do with them.

No one is making them be a part of this. They too should bear the burden and shame for what they have hired to be done on their, and through our system of government - our behalf.

Unjustly, unwisely, cruelly, illegally.

Again, rights not given to all are rights not given to any. Merely privilege.

If we, as a nation, cannot see fit to obey the law for moral reasons, whatever that says about our honor; as the nation that has arguably benefitted the most from a world order based upon rule of law, we should do so as a matter of pragmatism and cold hard calculation.

While "kick their ass, and take their gas" might have made a funny bumper sticker back in the 70's, it is hardly a sound policy for the world's militarily mightiest country in the 21st century.

If the only way our capitalist system can survive is by stealing from others, then it is not really capitalism, merely theft dressed up for appearances sake. Fooling no one, shaming ourselves.

This will not end well. Not only for them, but for us.

Do not act surprised if the states of the Southern Hemisphere do not unite and rise against us.

Wouldn't we do the same, if the tables were turned?

I would.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?