Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leo B Watkins's avatar

All good and fine.

And totally understand where an elected official like a Sheriff would want those numbers to be up. Parents vote.

But can't help but notice these metrics are based on people's "feelings".

I'd be more interested in data that confirmed that their presence actually reduced crime, drug usage, etc.

And also showing a clear relationship between those numbers and either the presence or absence of SRO's.

When you hear stories about schools with DARE programs having increases in drug usage, makes you wonder.

How much bang are we truly getting for our buck with these programs?

Shouldn't that be what really matters?

Not to mention, when's the last time we stepped back and looked at how much we have become a police state in the last 40-50 years?

Seems like we've traded a lot of freedom, and not sure how much safety we've gotten in return. There was a time when a gun in the back of a truck meant someone was going hunting after school.

Hardly a felony. Though I guess it's not like a felony conviction means they can't be President anymore. Long as they're rich. And lead a personality cult. And provide low grade entertainment to thoughtless idiots.

Otherwise, it might matter. As those same idiots are the same ones arguing against FORMER felons voting. (See recent Milde/Cole debate in House of Delegates).

Anyway, glad people at least FEEL safer. Hope they really are. Then maybe they can study good folks like Ben Franklin. Wonder what his thoughts would be?

Oh yeah.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety......"

Guess the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Expand full comment

No posts