Interesting the writer fails to mention that providing pornographic, sexually explicit materials to underage children is against the law. That it is against the law is the most pertinent fact at hand and has little or nothing to do with the many points argued in this piece. The efforts of Spotsylvania Public Schools to comply with existing laws forbidding the dissemination of said materials to children in their care overrides all other issues. Following the law has little to do with the greatness of this author or that one. It certainly has nothing to do with the race of said authors. The law applies to ALL authors. There are no exceptions in the law depending on the races of authors. It has nothing to do with what adults may read and/or the availability of that material to adults. It is precisely because this issue has nothing to do with what adults may or may not read that those who favor providing these materials to minor children do not argue that point. Instead, they pretend the issue involves some infringement of the right of adults to read. This is done intentionally in an attempt to confuse the actual issue and to deflect. That isn't very honest but it certainly is common in more than one way. The law against dissemination of this material to children applies not only to schools but also to businesses and individuals. That would include hardware stores. Also of note is the reluctance of defenders of this practice to present or include specific content of the books in question. Why is that? Any readers at all curious? Perhaps you should be:
Interesting the writer fails to mention that providing pornographic, sexually explicit materials to underage children is against the law. That it is against the law is the most pertinent fact at hand and has little or nothing to do with the many points argued in this piece. The efforts of Spotsylvania Public Schools to comply with existing laws forbidding the dissemination of said materials to children in their care overrides all other issues. Following the law has little to do with the greatness of this author or that one. It certainly has nothing to do with the race of said authors. The law applies to ALL authors. There are no exceptions in the law depending on the races of authors. It has nothing to do with what adults may read and/or the availability of that material to adults. It is precisely because this issue has nothing to do with what adults may or may not read that those who favor providing these materials to minor children do not argue that point. Instead, they pretend the issue involves some infringement of the right of adults to read. This is done intentionally in an attempt to confuse the actual issue and to deflect. That isn't very honest but it certainly is common in more than one way. The law against dissemination of this material to children applies not only to schools but also to businesses and individuals. That would include hardware stores. Also of note is the reluctance of defenders of this practice to present or include specific content of the books in question. Why is that? Any readers at all curious? Perhaps you should be:
http://booklooks.org/?fbclid=IwAR3bYKJnVgV0lj_tM_1cNu3qcoyyEcxe3BvAVtVjWFp7iV7K3Kagl2i1nKw
Test