Virginia Code Does Not Support Removing Books from Public Libraries, Study Finds
Spotsylvania is one of the counties that "incorrectly" based a now overturned decision to remove library books on a 2022 state law.
By Adele Uphaus
MANAGING EDITOR AND CORRESPONDENT
Email Adele
School divisions, such as Spotsylvania, that cited a 2022 state law to justify pulling certain books from library shelves were misinterpreting that law.
That’s according to a report presented on Monday to members of the General Assembly by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission.
The General Assembly passed a joint resolution early this year tasking JLARC with studying the removal of books from public libraries. The report presented this week was based on a survey JLARC sent to school divisions in the spring as part of this study.
The 2022 law, found in Code section 22.1-16.8, requires school divisions to adopt policies ensuring parental notification of any instructional material with sexually explicit content—but it does not require districts to remove books with such content, according to the commission.
“That 2022 law doesn't necessarily prohibit sexually explicit content, and it certainly doesn't require even contemplating removing a book from a school library if it does include sexually explicit content,” JLARC Associate Director Justin Brown, who worked on this study, told General Assembly members on Monday, according to reporting by the Virginia Scope. “It's quite clear to us—the law requires parental notification when a library book or some other instructional material will be required, and then it gives parents the option to request alternative material for their individual child.”
In March of 2023, Mark Taylor, then superintendent of Spotsylvania County schools, issued a memo announcing his decision to “exclude” 14 books that had been challenged by a community member from the school libraries. He said his decision was based on Virginia law, specifically the 2022 law requiring parental notification of sexually explicit content.
In October, Taylor removed 23 more titles from school libraries, for a total of 37. In January of 2024, the School Board, under new leadership, voted to restore all the removed books.
According to the JLARC report, Spotsylvania, Madison, Goochland, Rockingham, and Hanover counties together were responsible for 75% of all book removal actions in the state since July 1, 2020. Spotsylvania was responsible for 5% of these actions.
More than half of all school divisions—63%—reported taking no action to remove books from school libraries.
The survey asked divisions for the title and author of all books removed; whether the books were removed upon the recommendation of a "challenge committee" or by direction of an administrator, the superintendent, or the School Board; whether the librarian or media specialist was involved in the removal process; and whether the law requiring parental notification of sexually explicit content was used to justify the removal.
Spotsylvania reported pulling 19 titles from division libraries, according to the report. Division spokeswoman Rene Daniels said these 19 titles had been “professionally weeded” from the collection.
The division did not report the 37 titles that were removed in 2023 because “several of the books had been reinstated by direction of the school board,” Daniels said.
The law as passed by the General Assembly in April of 2022 includes an enactment clause stating that “the provisions of this act shall not be construed as requiring or providing for the censoring of books in public elementary and secondary schools.”
However, the enactment clause does not appear in the language on the state code website. In addition, a memo titled “Clarification on School Library Management,” released in June of 2023 by Lisa Coons, then the state superintendent of public instruction, does not clarify that the law is not applicable to removing books for all students.
The JLARC report states that these two factors “may have contributed to the incorrect citing of the 2022 law by some divisions as the reason for removing a book,” and that “it may be useful (at least for some divisions) for VDOE to more directly clarify that the 2022 law does not apply to removing school library books.”
Support the Advance with an Annual Subscription or Make a One-time Donation
The Advance has developed a reputation for fearless journalism. Our team delivers well-researched local stories, detailed analysis of the events that are shaping our region, and a forum for robust, informed discussion about current issues.
We need your help to do this work, and there are two ways you can support this work.
Sign up for annual, renewable subscription.
Make a one-time donation of any amount.
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit the link that follows.
This article is published under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. It can be distributed for noncommercial purposes and must include the following: “Published with permission by FXBG Advance.”