Candidate Profile: Phil Scott
Republican Phil Scott is seeking re-election in HD 63. Today, his interview with the Advance about what got him into politics, and the issues that matter to him.
By Martin Davis
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Email Martin
Phil Scott represents House District 63, which includes parts of Orange and Spotsylvania counties. The following is an interview he conducted with the Advance about why he got into politics, placing people over politics, and moving beyond polarization.
FXBG Advance: What got you into politics?
Phillip Scott: I was active in the church that we were attending, and another local church was looking for a new pastor. So I said to God, “OK, either pastor or politician.” I applied for the pastor’s job, and never got a phone call from the church.
About the same time I was getting involved with the local Republican Party and found myself running for School Board. I did not win that race because I spent the majority of that campaign season in D.C. after my daughter Brianna was born with Trisomy 18, or Edwards Syndrome. It’s similar to Down’s Syndrome, but more severe in many cases, and in her case, a lot more severe.
Because of her disability, Brianna was automatically qualified for Medicaid. Some of the hurdles we had to jump through, however, with Medicaid insurance made it clear this system needs to be fixed.
My state representative at the time was as helpful as he could be. When he decided not to seek re-election, however, the opportunity arose for me to run.
So ultimately, what pushed me into state politics was seeing what families like mine have to go through when it comes to Medicaid and children with complex medical issues.
FXBG Advance: Can you explain some of the problems you encountered and what you think some of the fixes for Medicaid involve?
Scott: For many people, fixing Medicaid is about delivering more money for the program, or creating more waiver slots. The more foundational problem, however, is that Medicaid’s basic navigation system is so broken, people can’t understand what they’re even eligible for. We’re almost six years into this, and we’re still learning new services that Brianna’s eligible for.
There should be more information provided to people about the program that guides them through the process, so that people don’t have to work through various agencies and nonprofits to help them understand the system. I want to get people connected to the resources that are available to them, and that’s one of my biggest drivers as a delegate.
FXBG Advance: So how do we do that?
Scott: I serve on the Disability Commission, and I’m constantly having conversations with state agencies as well as other groups and agencies involved with Medicaid. As things come up in those discussions that I see as hurdles for parents to overcome, I’ll bring those to the attention of the commission.
From there, legislation gets proposed. I’m very hesitant to carry legislation that I will personally benefit from, even if it benefits all of Virginia. So when it comes to changing things with Medicaid, I will hand off the legislation to a colleague. I don’t ever want someone to think I’m doing this just to make life better for me and my family.
Depending on how the legislation is going to impact my family, I may even abstain from the voting.
FXBG Advance: Can you provide an example?
Scott: Sure. So right now with Medicaid, if you have a child with severe autism and you have to provide extraordinary care beyond what would be expected for what someone should be able to do for themselves, a parent can actually get paid to be a caregiver.
My daughter qualifies for 24/7 skilled nursing coverage. However, when these nurses don’t show up, my wife and I have to fill in. So we’re staying up all night administering meds, we’re troubleshooting a trach when it pops out and reinserting it, we’re doing all these things. Because this is skilled nursing, however, we cannot get paid at all — even if my wife or I were licensed skilled nurses.
Right now, we’re looking at changing that. Maybe it’s not full pay for the parent, but maybe a percentage of what the nursing agency would get.
That’s not legislation that I would carry because it would have a direct financial impact on my family. Del. Patrick Hope has shown interest in this and so I’ll work with him and then hand it off for him to carry.
Kids with developmental disabilities have unique abilities to make positive impacts on the communities around them. But if we’re not supporting their families, then the community can’t enjoy those benefits.
FXBG Advance: What other issues are important to you?
Scott: Fixing education is also front-of-mind for me.
How do we make schools safer? How do we de-shackle our teachers, so to speak, so that they can have that freedom to teach in the classroom?
And then there are the Standards of Learning. There’s a predominant part of the political spectrum that sees SOLs as a necessary thing. I think there’s a better way to approach education than SOLs, I just don’t know what that is at the moment.
FXBG Advance: When you say a “better way to approach education,” what do you mean specifically by that?
Scott: It begins with rethinking brick-and-mortar education. The work world does not correlate today to that structure being offered by brick-and-mortar education.
Life is not going to a building, punching a clock, doing your job, punching a clock, and going home. Work life has changed.
The Advance doesn’t punch a clock or work out of a building. My uncle is a freelance journalist who writes for magazines. He doesn’t go into a building or punch a clock.
How do we change that system?
FXBG Advance: You’ve also been critical of the tax structure.
Scott: Yes. Small businesses in particular suffer with the tax structure that we have. There are taxes upon taxes that small businesses have to endure, as well as regulations. I’m always looking for ways to reduce the burden placed on small businesses.
A few years back I carried the Licensed Professional Counselor Compact that put us into compact with other states so that a licensed professional counselor can move to any state in that compact and practice.
This moved some red tape out of the way to allow people who want to come to Virginia and practice the opportunity to more-easily do that. The Biden Administration even recognized the bill with a commendation.
The funny thing is, this wasn’t even one of my ideas. It came from a constituent.
FXBG Advance: Can you say more about what it means to represent all your constituents, irrespective of party?
Scott: If I’m going to Richmond every single year and only carrying things that I think of, I’m not doing my job as a representative.
I go to Richmond to bring the ideas from my constituents, to advocate for them, and when I bring back a win, it’s a win for my district, it’s not a win for me.
A good example of this is the water issue that happened last summer in Orange. I immediately began working on legislation to address that situation. Then, right as session was starting, Richmond had a very similar water situation happen, and the majority party took my bill, word-for-word, and submitted it.
The only problem was, what they picked up wasn’t the final version, but a placeholder version. That was fine. I worked with the stakeholders all the way through to ensure that the version that came forward had all the fixes that it needed to be successful, so that we could get it through.
I worked with Chairman Sickles and Speaker Scott to make sure this bill got through the right way.
FXBG Advance: Like journalists, politicians don’t have the greatest reputations. How do we fix that?
Scott: It’s sitting down with folks and having real conversations. It’s being out in the community and having real conversations with people. As much as people don’t like it when we knock on their doors and ask for their votes, they do appreciate the fact that their elected representative is showing up and asking, “What matters to you?”
In 2021, I ran as an average, everyday dad. I didn’t run as a businessman, or as a college graduate. I just ran as a dad.
At the end of the day, that’s what I am, and I’m just trying to make Virginia better. There are other dads out there like me, who want their kids to grow up in a safe community, and to do whatever job they want to do, and to prosper at what they do.
That’s it. That’s all we want.
That’s my identity as a politician. Just a dad trying to do right by my kids.
From there, it’s connecting with folks, showing up for events, owning your mistakes.
FXBG Advance: In the polarizing times that we live, the tagline on your campaign website — Christian, Constitutional, Conservative — does bother some people. How do you respond to that?
Scott: I was once asked about that by a high school student. The person wanted to know how that statement connects us.
I responded that, “I am saying that I am a Christian, that is the belief system that I adhere to.” I also believe in the Constitution, and I adhere to certain conservative values.
And because I adhere to those things, if I start doing something that goes against the Bible, I expect people to call me out on it, and I am obligated to respond with humility. That same approach applies to the Constitution. And it applies to my conservative values.
I’m giving you my grading system. If I’m missing the mark on these things, then I expect to be called out on that.
I don’t expect everyone to live according to my beliefs.
If people see me stepping out of line according to my beliefs then people should hold me to account. I think more politicians should do that, and be receptive when they’re held accountable.
I am submitting myself to this standard for my constituents’ benefit.
FXBG Advance: How do we get past the dysfunctional political divide we find ourselves in?
Scott: I thought I had the answer in just talking with people, having conversations. But it’s not that easy.
I do believe one of the best things that we’re doing is getting cellphones out of classrooms. Getting rid of social media is another thing that we could stand to have less of.
Social media empowers people to say and do whatever they want with impunity.
And it amplifies what should be relatively minor disagreements.
Here’s an example. Years ago, my wife attended a church where two women had been in a feud because one woman had stepped on the other’s foot, and the other was upset because that hadn’t been acknowledged. This anger went on for several years, when it finally came out the woman didn’t know she’d stepped on the other’s foot. She was focused on getting to a child who was about to hurt themselves.
In that setting, the dispute was unfortunate, but relatively limited.
In the social media environment, the situation draws in 50, 100 people who start taking sides, and minor disagreements become major bones of contention that can spiral out of control.
When that happens, the ability to go back and simply apologize for that one slight is long gone.
Support the Advance with an Annual Subscription or Make a One-time Donation
The Advance has developed a reputation for fearless journalism. Our team delivers well-researched local stories, detailed analysis of the events that are shaping our region, and a forum for robust, informed discussion about current issues.
We need your help to do this work, and there are two ways you can support this work.
Sign up for annual, renewable subscription.
Make a one-time donation of any amount.
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit the link that follows.
This article is published under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. It can be distributed for noncommercial purposes and must include the following: “Published with permission by FXBG Advance.”
MMMmmm....how simple and easy.
And yet, this gentleman says he is a Republican. The party that is currently working as hard as it can, even staying up all night - to gut the very Medicaid his family is dependent upon and whom he wants to pay him when he takes care of his daughter. One law for me, one law for thee....
He states that he is a Christian, yet belongs to a party that looks to put the 10 Commandments of the Old Testament into schools, rather than the Beatitudes of the New. As if any religious commandments should be in a public school when the Constitution demands freedom of religion. And by implication, FROM religion. If his is the only religion that is free, then it's not really a freedom, is it?
He claims to want to free educators to teach, yet makes a choice to represent a party that has reached down from on high to pick and choose the president at a state college because he didn't suit them? How is that not micromanagement? They are only free to teach what suits you? Again, that's not freedom for everybody, just for you.
He wants to change having kids show up at school, at the same time his party is demanding that adults show up in person at jobs because remote work doesn't work? I'd say the one true Republican theme here is talking out of both sides of their mouth. No wonder they insist on being led by a felon convicted of fraud for his lies.
Corporations are the ones suffering from the tax structure? ICYMI, again - Republicans, whom Delegate Scott chooses to belong to, are this very week passing a tax law which systemically robs the poor to give to the richest. The division between the haves and the have nots was already the worst it could be since the age of the robber barons before this boondoggle. This only worsens it.
How going trillions more into debt to make that happen is supposed to be "conservative" is beyond me. When we were already trillions into debt from the last time the Republican party was in charge. With recent projections that Social Security is now only 8 years away from bankruptcy.
Finally, blaming "social media" seems like an easy punching bag. He claims to represent all, and bring us closer together - and yet his chosen leader, whom cannot be questioned without the questioner being excommunicated from the cult/party and primaried out - calls half of all Americans "scum". And yet that is who he chooses to follow.
Maybe people complaining about being called scum as their rights, laws, economy, honor, integrity, etc. are ground into dust and trampled on by a cult that would be king isn't the problem......but hey, I guess it sounds good to those who would do anything to ignore any and all of the above. Whether they be political candidates trying to rationalize the irrational, or editors trying to do the same.
If AOC would just quit getting so many likes on Facebook we'd all be happier. But would we be? Should we be?
Moooving on now......
I wish that Mr. Scott had explained what he means by “rethinking brick-and-mortar” education. Does he mean returning to pandemic-era virtual learning, which was an unmitigated disaster?
Additionally, I’m troubled by this statement: “I think there’s a better way to approach education than SOLs, I just don’t know what that is at the moment.” Mr. Scott does have any ideas after three years in office? Or didn’t want to bother thinking of any as he runs for reelection?