Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leo B Watkins's avatar

MMMmmm....how simple and easy.

And yet, this gentleman says he is a Republican. The party that is currently working as hard as it can, even staying up all night - to gut the very Medicaid his family is dependent upon and whom he wants to pay him when he takes care of his daughter. One law for me, one law for thee....

He states that he is a Christian, yet belongs to a party that looks to put the 10 Commandments of the Old Testament into schools, rather than the Beatitudes of the New. As if any religious commandments should be in a public school when the Constitution demands freedom of religion. And by implication, FROM religion. If his is the only religion that is free, then it's not really a freedom, is it?

He claims to want to free educators to teach, yet makes a choice to represent a party that has reached down from on high to pick and choose the president at a state college because he didn't suit them? How is that not micromanagement? They are only free to teach what suits you? Again, that's not freedom for everybody, just for you.

He wants to change having kids show up at school, at the same time his party is demanding that adults show up in person at jobs because remote work doesn't work? I'd say the one true Republican theme here is talking out of both sides of their mouth. No wonder they insist on being led by a felon convicted of fraud for his lies.

Corporations are the ones suffering from the tax structure? ICYMI, again - Republicans, whom Delegate Scott chooses to belong to, are this very week passing a tax law which systemically robs the poor to give to the richest. The division between the haves and the have nots was already the worst it could be since the age of the robber barons before this boondoggle. This only worsens it.

How going trillions more into debt to make that happen is supposed to be "conservative" is beyond me. When we were already trillions into debt from the last time the Republican party was in charge. With recent projections that Social Security is now only 8 years away from bankruptcy.

Finally, blaming "social media" seems like an easy punching bag. He claims to represent all, and bring us closer together - and yet his chosen leader, whom cannot be questioned without the questioner being excommunicated from the cult/party and primaried out - calls half of all Americans "scum". And yet that is who he chooses to follow.

Maybe people complaining about being called scum as their rights, laws, economy, honor, integrity, etc. are ground into dust and trampled on by a cult that would be king isn't the problem......but hey, I guess it sounds good to those who would do anything to ignore any and all of the above. Whether they be political candidates trying to rationalize the irrational, or editors trying to do the same.

If AOC would just quit getting so many likes on Facebook we'd all be happier. But would we be? Should we be?

Moooving on now......

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Yanoff's avatar

I wish that Mr. Scott had explained what he means by “rethinking brick-and-mortar” education. Does he mean returning to pandemic-era virtual learning, which was an unmitigated disaster?

Additionally, I’m troubled by this statement: “I think there’s a better way to approach education than SOLs, I just don’t know what that is at the moment.” Mr. Scott does have any ideas after three years in office? Or didn’t want to bother thinking of any as he runs for reelection?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts