1 Comment

Two points--1) Agreeing that there are two viable legal interpretations why wouldn't City Council err on the side of a public process that better protects the city's interests and goals? 2) City Residents had been trying since at least March to get City Council members to discuss their issues with the Mary's Landing project and process. When council did finally respond no answers were forthcoming and residents were told they should go to the developer with their problems. This occurred before an attorney was hired. To use litigation as an excuse for months of stonewalling is disingenuous at best.

Expand full comment