By Jeff Mayhugh
This article was republished with permission from FXBG Advance’s news partner InsideNoVa.com. Sign up for InsideNoVa.com’s free email subscription today.
The Technological Revolution has begun, and Virginia is fueling it by building the infrastructure.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the world, setting off a global race for resources. Energy infrastructure has united us but, if exploited, threatens to divide us. America and the world are in a state of flux. We need quality leaders to turn the page to the next chapter of American greatness.
Over the past decade, Virginia has been on the cutting edge of the technological revolution, becoming the data center capital of the world. Nearly 70% of the world’s internet traffic runs through the Piedmont clay. In Virginia, the power demand is growing at a rate not seen since World War II. As a result, bills are expected to rise by a little over 2.5% each year over the next 15 years.
How Virginia deals with the problems of protecting this infrastructure and the environment while meeting energy demand without skyrocketing costs will provide a template for the rest of the country as the rise in AI increases energy demand in other states.
The Virginia governor’s race between Democrat Abigail Spanberger and Republican Winsome Earle-Sears creates an opportunity to lead on the national stage. While the data centers are an eyesore and nuisance for the local community, they are instrumental for the growth of new economic centers of power that will help not just Virginians but all Americans. The AI sector is essential for the United States to remain at the top of the global hegemony.
But data centers require enormous amounts of electricity to run and water to cool – and Virginia is struggling to keep up with demand.
Meeting that challenge requires bold leadership, and outgoing Gov. Glenn Youngkin has laid important groundwork. He has worked to match energy production with demand to keep costs down for citizens. He has taken an “all of the above” approach, looking to create public and private investments in wind, hydrogen, large-scale batteries, pumped-storage hydropower, solar and small nuclear modular reactors, known as SMRs.
Virginia passed the Virginia Clean Economy Act, which mandates that the state’s electric companies transition to 100% renewable energy sources by 2050. Currently, Virginia is mainly powered by natural gas, accounting for 55% of energy. Nuclear energy is second at 32%, and solar energy is third at 5%.
Compared to wind and solar energy, nuclear energy has a smaller footprint, with higher production and lower carbon output.
Nuclear energy is the best option to meet demand while limiting environmental impact and reducing carbon emissions, but it still carries the shadow of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl. Yet, Three Mile Island’s containment systems worked, preventing disaster. And as Belarusian physicist Stanislav Shushkevich noted, Chernobyl was more a failure of governance than of technology. It’s time to rebrand “nuclear energy” as “atomic energy” and launch a public-private campaign to educate Americans on its safety and promise.
Energy transitions are natural in human history. We transitioned from wood to coal and to oil and gas. Each energy source is a product of availability, and each faces different challenges that create positive and negative effects. The more resources devoted to an energy source, the cleaner, more efficient and safer it becomes. When progress stagnates, it signals a need for transition.
In addition to the demand for energy, Virginia must also update its energy infrastructure to keep up with the growing demand and to protect consumers from losing access to power due to hackers abroad.
Spanberger and Earle-Sears should capitalize on this opportunity and put forth a Virginia plan for energy abundance and security to fuel and protect the technological revolution. Right now, neither candidate has an energy plan on her website.
Spanberger, however, has been endorsed by Clean Virginia, an organization “to advance clean government and clean energy by fighting utility monopoly corruption in Virginia politics.” And although she was lieutenant governor under Youngkin, Earle-Sears has, so far, avoided touting the administration’s achievements in energy.
Voters should demand a plan before the election so they can feel confident when they go to the polls in November. The next governor won’t just shape Virginia’s energy future. She’ll help write the blueprint for the nation. This race isn’t just about politics – it’s about power itself: who generates it, controls it and benefits from it in the Tech Age.
Jeff Mayhugh is the founding editor of Politics and Parenting, a former congressional candidate and vice president at No Cap Fund.
Support the Advance with an Annual Subscription or Make a One-time Donation
The Advance has developed a reputation for fearless journalism. Our team delivers well-researched local stories, detailed analysis of the events that are shaping our region, and a forum for robust, informed discussion about current issues.
We need your help to do this work, and there are two ways you can support this work.
Sign up for annual, renewable subscription.
Make a one-time donation of any amount.
Local Obituaries
To view local obituaries or to send a note to family and loved ones, please visit the link that follows.
This article is published under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. It can be distributed for noncommercial purposes and must include the following: “Published with permission by FXBG Advance.”
Somewhere in the ether, Paul Harvey just spoke to me. So now, the rest of the story....
Ummm, yes Youngkin said all of the above.
But also pulled Virginia out of the RGGI. Illegally, some might say - and certainly dishonorably. And your "all the above" also embraces coal, and diesel, and, I'm assuming wood fires, based upon it's tag, you left a few things off regarding nuclear...errr..sorry, ATOMIC energy.
Like Fukishima. Nagasaki. Hiroshima.
That we currently have no reliable place to store our used nuclear material. That it has a 10000 year half life before it's safe. That Fredericksburg is 20 miles downwind of North Lake Anna. Which lies within 5 miles of a previously unknown ground fault that had a significant earthquake 5 years ago.
So we don't have the technology to store it safely. We need there to be geopolitical stability for 10000 years. And there not be any earthquakes, asteroid strikes, drone attacks, violent revolutions, or educational dark ages for 10000 years. When the whole of even partial recorded human history is 5000 years, and for many civilizations is under 500.
With nuclear only being present for the last 80 or so. You're so right. What could possibly go wrong?
Another fun fact. Virginia is one of 50 states. Subject to federal laws as well. Especially including things like energy. Where the party that Mr Youngkin and Ms Earle-Sears belongs to is actively looking to destroy safety nets, free study of dangers, or regulations to prevent harm to citizens.
Not only are we downwind from Lake Anna, we are also downwind from Ohio. So when they fire up their coal powered, all the above power plant to power Jeff Bezo's AI centers - guess who's kids get to breathe the particulate matter? Anyone? Anyone?
Finally, let's remember that old saw that if a deal sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
So when you're claiming that data centers are something we gotta have, and Mr Davis is claiming that they are the 2nd coming of Christ, ready to spread free money like manna from heaven in return for those higher power bills (and water shortages, etc) - let's just pause a minute and consider the fable of Manassas, not manna.
In that they too built a data center. In hopes that they could cash in on the boom and be rich like Loudon. Only to find out THEIR data center had found a loop hole. In that they could claim their equipment was banking equipment, and SURPRISE! not subject to tools taxes like expected.
Sure, they'll get some money from it's existence, but a fraction of what was originally promised/expected.
So I'd say the issue is much more cloudy than presented here. Though the choice on who will best lead us through it could not be more clear.
Throughout her career, Ms Spanberger has shown herself to be knowledgeable, reasonable, and trustworthy while respectful enough to listen to and find common ground with those who do not share her vision. I doubt she would belong to a party that would call half of her constituency scum. Or agree to be led by a felon, to attack knowledge, civil liberties, ....... well, no need to repeat it. If you know, you know.
But again, the choice of candidate and party are clear. We would be wise to make it.